On this he wouldn't be able to give plausible deniability, because he knows the media wouldn't take it with nuance since he didn't add a few sentences that would have avoided that. If Baier made the guy answer why he thought he shouldn't provide nuance himself and if he genuinely didn't expect the lack of nuance outcome from the media. Baier approached this point but wasn't very cutting. Give me one example of something remotely comparable.Īsk the FagBI liar what he thought the media reaction would be. If something is a hallmark it happens many times.
#Thehunter classic hacks plus
Would mean a decade plus prep on Hunter Biden for this, etc.
#Thehunter classic hacks crack
Hard to imagine Russians went in with the plan and dedication to deepfake all those crack photos, incest, somehow forcing Hunter to leave his laptops around like loose change at repair shops and clubs, with a verifiable email chain between people you can check on in the US. It doesn't have hallmarks of Russian disinfo (which AFAIK is a modern euphemism for publishing true things about Hillary on Facebook?). He could have easily broken that in a number of ways, like: Leftists still getting treated with kids' gloves.īaier left the FagBI guy with plausible deniability to a large amount of the audience, i.e., the same people who fell for it the first time will be inclined to lazily blame media for not giving it a nuanced view and digging into it. This was a strongly worded letter version of what could have been way worse. Hey, thanks again for the reply - cheers ) But where all the discussion of “Russian Disinformation” came from, I’m not sure. That’s all.įunctionally, I agree with you the letter is an underhanded partisan smear designed to mislead. They cite media reports (Washington Post) as evidence that Russia is connected to Giuliani, who provided the laptop to NY Post, and they imply that Russia could have been involved in the timing of the dump of accurate information. So if it’s not disinformation, and the operation could just be the dumping of accurate information, what’s the problem? They go on to explain that an information operation can include the dumping of accurate information. Instead, they characterize “the case,” meaning the release of Hunter’s emails, as having “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. That phrase is only used in a quote, pulled from USA Today. Nowhere does it state the laptop is “Russian disinformation,” as the CIA guy clarifies in the clip. Nowhere does it state the emails are not genuine.
#Thehunter classic hacks series
The letter signed by the officials contains a series of true statements. Here’s the strict version, which is why I view CIA/Baier exchange differently:
Examine that phrase I quoted it's a old one but a good one.I disagree, but only strictly speaking. No I haven't used any of these but their home forums have had allot of complaints of viruses from these yet there they still are. How do you know they won't out-source a anti-cheat program that will do more harm than good?Īll I have to say is "You're judged by the company you keep". Hell check out my profile (Knoxx) and see my weapons. I have no complaints giving EW money for things in this game. Remember on the internet, if something is free, then you're the product, but since you play for a longer time than me, you should know that.On my side, I never use a link where someone offers you to earn money, that's your own choice.Īgain you are very think headed. I still don't see where they "take" your money without your agreement. This is the area in which EW has accepted money from people to try to scam you.Īnd EW force you to click on obvious spam thread? I subscribe to a few newspaper online, I pay for all of them, and still i have dozens of links heading to advertising and other malwares sites. In your browser go to The Hunters website after you log in there is a tab that says "Earn em$".
Originally posted by Knoxx212:I have played this game since 2009 and have given them plenty of money.
0 kommentar(er)
